False
Teachers Say…
Sprinkling and Pouring are Proper Ways to
Baptize
The churches of Christ Greet You (Romans
The first known
case of
sprinkling was upon a man by the name of Novation in 251 A.D. He was
near
death, according to Eusebius. This was not a common practice in this
era.
Later, it became the rule, when other doctrines were in place such as:
Adam's
original sin, infant baptism, etc. Sprinkling for baptism was accepted
during
this period on an emergency basis. It was developed through a tradition
called,
"Baptisms of the sick." Baptism at that time was upheld as necessary
to obtain the remission of sins and for salvation. Since many of the
un‑baptized
would become terminally ill and immersion seemed unwise, the priests
used
small amounts of water to pour upon the subject’s head. Where is the
authority
for this clear tradition of man? (Col. 3:17).
In 1311 A.D., the
council at
No matter how hard one might try, you can't make
the Greek
word baptidzo, which means "immerse," to mean “pour” or
"sprinkle." The Greek word cheo means “to pour.” The Greek
word rhantidzo means "to sprinkle." It is true that the New
Testament reveals the blood of Christ being sprinkled for sin, but only
in the
typical of the blood of animals in the Old Testament (Heb. 9:13;
10:1‑11;
12:24; 1 Peter 1:2). "And almost all things are by the law purged with
blood, and without shedding of blood is no remission" (Heb.
Sprinkling or
pouring does not come
close to fitting the idea of a burial, but that is what baptism is,
according
to inspired truth (Rom. 6:4; Col. 2:12). Baptism is indeed a complete
covering
of the old man of sin. “Much water” (John
No matter how hard one tries to accommodate men, the Word of God will always read the same way (Gal. 1:6‑12; 2 Thess. 1:6-9). In order to lay claim to the grace of God, we "must" do His will first and always (Matt. 7:21‑23; Luke 6:46; Heb. 5:8‑9).
Go To: Seven Things Wrong with Denominational Baptism
Return
To: Short
Important Lessons
Return To: BAPTISM
Return To Home Page